This is the Rant, the Whole Rant, and Nothing But the Rant. So Help Me, Rant.

57

By Stump Parrish

Please allow me to mention that there was no planning involved with this hub. I just felt like a little rant and being in the bible belt, it ain't hard to find sumthin' to complain about. I would also like to point out that this is not directed at any one person. However, if what I say makes you mad, that just might be the sign, it's for you.

"Civil War Sesquicentennial Celebration In S.C.

A story on the AP caught my attention as this "Historical Celebration" has been in the opinion section of my local paper for a couple of weeks now.

Broken link removed page no longer found

Another Media Source Hs An Opinon

The Spartanburg Herald Journal actually published an editorial that in my opinion, was historicaly correct. This is probably due to my agreeing with them on most of their points and, this could be due to my starting my education in the north. Well above The Mason-Dummy Line.

Observances should remember real history, not cherished myths

http://www.goupstate.com/article/20101205/ARTICLES/12051020/1128/opinion01?p=1&tc=pg


We should have made more progress during the past 150 years. Observances of the 150th anniversary of various events leading up to the Civil War should be marked by a look at the real history of our state and nation, not the same fights about the myths surrounding the war.

While that may be the case with some observances of the conflict, there are clearly those who want to promote their favorite misconceptions.

The Post and Courier of Charleston reports that the Sons of Confederate Veterans will be holding a “Secession Ball” on Dec. 20 to mark the anniversary of the signing of the state's Ordinance of Secession.

Jeff Antley, an organizer of the event, told the Post and Courier the ball will celebrate the secession movement, which was “a demonstration of freedom.” “What I'm doing is honoring the men from this state who stood up for their self-government and their rights under law,” he said.

And Now, For the Rest of the Story


The Commander, South Carolina Division, Sons of Confederate Veterans Had this to say...

"The finger-pointing is always directed solely at the South, as if Northern states had no part in the slave trade. That’s the biggest myth. Slavery was not merely a Southern problem. It was an American problem, and Northern states cannot escape their share of the responsibility, in particular, its very foundation in America.

When it comes to slavery, the sad truth is that no state and no Congress ever suggested a nationally funded program to remedy the problem, not even abolitionists. The only solution Abraham Lincoln ever proposed to the moral challenge of slavery was deportation of free blacks back to Africa.

For decades, Southern states were angered by excessively high protective tariffs levied on various agricultural products, including cotton shipped to Northern factories, and were generally dissatisfied that the compact of states was no longer beneficial to them. Secession, which had been strongly considered by New England states during the War of 1812, was now the final solution to managing and handling Southern states’ own problems, a right they believed was protected by the U.S. Constitution.

The Sons of Confederate Veterans makes no claim that slavery wasn’t an issue, only that it wasn’t the primary cause but one of many. What is disingenuous about the editorial is the omission of all the facts that prompted South Carolina and other Southern states to secede. These indeed are relevant and should be studied by contemporary Americans. Ironically, those who take it upon themselves to study these issues may find many similar parallels exist today, much like those of 1860."

Mark A. Simpson

Commander, South Carolina Division, Sons of Confederate Veterans

Just My Opinion, Please Ignore It.

The lie that the civil war wasn't about slavery is still being passed on as actual fact to new generations of southern baptists and home schooled students.

The entire culture and economy of the south was based upon the ownership of African American slaves. Any disruption of this system would mean the collapse of the entire way of life to the ruling white class.

There Have Been Several Well Stated Responses That Agreed With the Herald Journal Article


http://www.goupstate.com/article/20101209/ARTICLES/12091006/1129/opinion02?Title=Thursday-s-letters-Professor-8217-s-liberal-bias

Age-old misconception

The Herald-Journal’s Sunday editorial, “Observances should remember real history, not cherished myths,” attempts to squeeze some truths out of the age-old misconception about “causes” of the American Civil War, stating explicitly that the war was fought over the “primary” issue of slavery.

"The Sons of Confederate Veterans makes no claim that slavery wasn’t an issue, only that it wasn’t the primary cause but one of many." Mark A. Simpson Commander, South Carolina Division, Sons of Confederate Veterans

Here Comes the Rant Part, Let's See Where We End Up This Time.

I still see and hear this racist mentality in action on a regular basis and have to ask why it's still so prevelant in white, southern baptists to this day? People that I went to school with in the 70's still feel that the black race is an inferior race of people. Of course they feel the same way about the Jewish, Catholics, Islamics, Homosexuals, Mexicans...and the list goes on and on and on and on...

Hold on Folks, We're Changing Canoes Mid Stream...

Where does this need to feel superior to everyone else come from? Does it say somewhere in the bible that christians are supposed to dominate and control all who look or think differently? I don't recall reading or hearing that the bible states that christians shall hold dominion over all people who differ in some percieved way, do you?

Look Out, White Water Ahead...

Then again, I see very little in the actions of most christians down here in the bible belt that's bible based. It seems to me that the rules of the game are this, you don't actually have to follow any rules as long as you believe you should, and do everything in your power to force other to follow them. Since no one is capable of obeying all the rules you, and all who think like you do, are free to pick and choose the ones to ignore.

Ok, I'm better now. I am aware that this is not the mentality of all christians but would like to point out that it is the mentality of enough of them down here to control elections. Those elected to office with this mentality can't seem to follow any rules. Not the ones in the bible or the ones they pass for the rest of us to follow. Just a higher class of people who know they are better than the rest of us. But they sure is good christians ain't they?

Time Out

Now, if you remember the actual subject of the hub had nothing to do with why the worst educated states in this country are also the most religious states. What does it say for christianity that it flourishes anywhere intelligence and critical thinking is lacking? Why do uneducated people tend to flock to religion and their fellow religious followers, for guidance and support? It's almost like there is an as yet undiscovered F.Gump gene that forces one to be repelled by independent thought, the truth and un-redacted history. How does one have the American History Re-Dacted to suit your beliefs? Send it to the christian conservative state of history and they will remove facts and substitute any lies and distortions you request. This is how the Chrished Myth becomes the accepted version of real history. Good plan there folks, keep the knowlege away from those who might have the nerve to believe the truth you can't accept. Pretty soon you end up with entire sections of the country that are too stupid to realize just how stupid they are. But they are smart enough to know that the scientists who spent their entire lives studying don't know anything, ya know. 

Back to the War...

A semi-educated person can find the truth about the civil war and the reasons for it if they desire. The church and civic leaders in the bible belt attempt to cover up and/or distort the truth about this war and bible-belters flock to hear it.

It has reached the point that foreign student know more about American history than America history students do. This ain't abotherin' them that's raisin' up yougin' here the south no how.

The majority of voters in this area elect those who keep things the way they are. The quality of education has remained about the same here in SC since the 70's. You didn't really need to know how to read to get a high school diploma back then and I'll bet they still pass 'em out for good behavior today.

Well, if you made it this far, you might as well leave a comment. Peace everyone.

Comments

HSchneider Level 6 Commenter 17 months ago

I enjoyed your rant Stump. It was good to get a viewpoint from a transplanted northerner who now has lived in S.C. for quite a while. It amazes me as a life long northerner that after 150 years, apologists for the south are still necessary. The main and driving force of the Civil War was slavery. Yes, there were other issues but they pale in comparison. Our founding fathers punted this issue down the road when they wrote the Constitution. Slavery was being to shrink in importance. Then Eli Whitney invented the cotton gin and the need for slaves was greater than ever. The South became intransigent on the issue and the war was inevitable. To deny or minimize this is being ignorant or evil or both.

GNelson profile image

GNelson Level 4 Commenter 17 months ago

Stump you covered a lot of ground. Enjoyed it!!!

Wesman Todd Shaw profile image

Wesman Todd Shaw 17 months ago

I don't really think that the Civil War was about slavery; it was more about Rothschild central banking, and were it not for the Tsar sending his entire pacific fleet, the the South would have received military aid from both England and France. Lincoln famously said, "I've the Southern army before me, and the banks at my rear; of the two, I fear the enemy at my back the most"

My paraphrase.

Stump Parrish profile image

Stump Parrish Hub Author 17 months ago

HS, Thanks for the comment. It never ceases to amaze at how little knowledge of this countries history is actually known down here. I am reffering to actual facts and not the cherished myths kept alive in the hearts and minds of so many.

What is a bigger problem down here is that they still retain this abilityto disregard facts. They can stare straight at current facts, and believe any new myth their chosen elected liar starts.

There is something in the red dirt down here that causes those who walk on it to develop an IQ lower than said dirt.

Stump Parrish profile image

Stump Parrish Hub Author 17 months ago

GN, Thanks for stopping by. Happy Holidays

Stump Parrish profile image

Stump Parrish Hub Author 17 months ago

Hey WTS, I have to disagree, I know that the Rothschilds, the Tsar, England and france affected the outcome of the war but I don't think the were the primary reason for it. Almost every reason given todeay to disprove this is rooted in slavery. Slavery was the basis for every aspect of southern life for those who controlled the government and fought to leave the Union. The entire economy was based on slave labor. The southern states felt they had the right to live the same life they had grown accustomed to. The states felt they had the right to do with their property as they saw fit. That their property included human beings that were treated as animals, was not what they sought to retain ownership of. Peace my friend, I hope the holiday season is everything you and yours want it to be.

Wesman Todd Shaw profile image

Wesman Todd Shaw 17 months ago

Thanks Stump! I'm looking forward to burning green colored plants with some folks, and eating some awesome food! Hope you get to enjoy any of that kind of thing that you want to enjoy.

Yep, Southern aristocracy was a wicked thing, but aristocracy is typically wicked worldwide; and surely, those fat slaving bastards only wanted to stay that way; no doubt about it. I just tend to up-play the things in our history that have been suppressed, and for obvious reasons(federal reserve. . . . .rothschild)

Submit a Comment
Members and Guests

Sign in or sign up and post using a hubpages account.



    • No HTML is allowed in comments, but URLs will be hyperlinked
    • Comments are not for promoting your Hubs or other sites

    Please wait working